Abstract
Objective
Patients and Methods
Results
Conclusion
Abbreviations and Acronyms:
CI (confidence interval), EHR (electronic health record), PNA (poor neonatal adaptation), PS (propensity score), REP (Rochester Epidemiology Project), RR (relative risk), SNRI (serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor), SSRI (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor)- Nörby U.
- Forsberg L.
- Wide K.
- Sjörs G.
- Winbladh B.
- Källén K.
- Jiminez-Solem E.
- Andersen J.T.
- Petersen M.
- et al.
- Westin A.A.
- Brekke M.
- Molden E.
- Skogvoll E.
- Spigset O.
Methods
Data Source and Study Sample
Exposure
Outcome
- Finnegan L.P.
- Kron R.E.
- Connaughton J.R.
- Emich J.P.
Risk Factors
Statistical Analysis
Results

Maternal characteristics | PNA (n=44) | No PNA (n=1200) | PNA vs no PNA |
---|---|---|---|
n (%) | n (%) | P value | |
Advanced maternal age | 10 (23.0) | 174 (14.0) | .13 |
Race | .24 | ||
Caucasian | 38 (86) | 1069 (89) | |
African American | 0 (0) | 41 (3) | |
Asian or Pacific Islander | 1 (2) | 15 (1) | |
Hispanic or non-Caucasian | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Other or unknown | 5 (11) | 75 (6) | |
Level of education | .29 | ||
Less than high school | 0 (0) | 69 (6) | |
HS graduate or GED | 6 (14) | 207 (17) | |
Some college | 10 (23) | 338 (28) | |
College degree | 12 (27) | 280 (23) | |
Graduate or professional degree | 14 (32) | 243 (20) | |
Missing or unknown | 2 (5) | 63 (5) | |
Urban residence | 32 (73) | 968 (81) | .18 |
Primiparous | 21 (48) | 311 (26) | .008 |
Any maternal mood disorder d Maternal mood disorder was defined as evidence of diagnosed major depressive disorder, persistent depressive disorder, dysthymic disorder, other depressive disorder (depressive disorder, not otherwise specified; other specified depressive disorder; or other unspecified depressive disorder), bipolar I or II disorder, cyclothymic disorder, or other bipolar disorder (bipolar disorder, not otherwise specified; other specified bipolar spectrum disorder; other unspecified bipolar spectrum disorder), as identified in maternal electronic health records during pregnancy or in the year preceding the estimated onset of pregnancy. | 25 (57) | 515 (43) | .09 |
Any maternal anxiety disorder e Maternal anxiety disorder was defined as evidence of diagnosed generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder (with or without agoraphobia), specific phobia, social phobia (or social anxiety disorder), posttraumatic stress disorder, acute stress disorder, or other anxiety disorder (anxiety disorder, not otherwise specified; other specified anxiety disorder; other unspecified anxiety disorder), as identified in maternal electronic health records during pregnancy or in the year preceding the estimated onset of pregnancy. | 18 (41) | 269 (22) | .009 |
Pregnancy and delivery information | n (%) | n (%) | P value |
Method of delivery (current pregnancy) | .16 | ||
Spontaneous vaginal | 23 (52) | 790 (66) | |
Cesarean | 14 (32) | 273 (23) | |
Other or unknown | 7 (16) | 137 (11) | |
Any pregnancy or delivery complication f Pregnancy or delivery complications included evidence of diagnosed postpartum hemorrhage, congenital infections (toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, group B streptococcus, group A streptococcus), coagulopathy during pregnancy, hypertensive complications during pregnancy (gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, Hemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes, and Low Platelets [HELLP] syndrome), fetal malpresentation, or premature rupture of membranes complicating the current pregnancy or delivery, as identified in maternal or infant electronic health records. | 19 (43) | 438 (36) | .43 |
Assisted reproductive technology used | 3 (7) | 38 (3) | .17 |
Maternal drug use during pregnancy | |||
Smoking | 12 (27) | 259 (22) | .36 |
Alcohol | 5 (11) | 101 (8) | .42 |
Opioids | 7 (16) | 143 (12) | .48 |
Benzodiazepines | 2 (5) | 51 (4) | .71 |
Psychostimulants | 0 (0) | 13 (1) | 1.00 |
Cannabis | 3 (7) | 51 (4) | .44 |
Major congenital malformation, if any | 1 (2.3) | 23 (2) | .58 |
Maternal characteristics | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | P value |
Maternal age at delivery (y) | 30 (26-34) | 29 (26-33) | .13 |
N medications taken during the third trimester | 3.5 (2.0-5.0) | 3.0 (2.0-5.0) | .13 |
Infant characteristics | Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | P value |
Male sex | 28 (64) | 593 (49) | .07 |
NICU admission, first 24 h of life | 8 (18) | 54 (4) | .001 |
Gestational length (d) | 273 (269-278) | 274 (270-280) | .22 |
Birth weight (g) | 3378 (3058-3611) | 3420 (3120-3740) | .26 |
Head circumference (cm) | 34.2 (33.0-35.0) | 34.5 (33.5-35.5) | .53 |
APGAR scores (min) | |||
1 | 8 (6-9) | 8 (7-9) | .02 |
5 | 9 (8-9) | 9 (9-9) | .07 |
2000 (n=18) | 2001 (n=28) | 2002 (n=45) | 2003 (n=48) | 2004 (n=73) | 2005 (n=101) | 2006 (n=93) | 2007 (n=102) | 2008 (n=98) | 2009 (n=137) | 2010 (n=128) | 2011 (n=140) | 2012 (n=118) | 2013 (n=133) | Total (n=1262) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Citalopram | 3 (17) | 1 (4) | 11 (24) | 8 (17) | 19 (26) | 29 (29) | 27 (29) | 28 (27) | 24 (24) | 32 (23) | 29 (23) | 38 (27) | 31 (26) | 32 (24) | 312 (25%) |
Escitalopram | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (3) | 2 (2) | 4 (4) | 2 (2) | 4 (4) | 5 (4) | 3 (2) | 4 (3) | 7 (6) | 7 (5) | 40 (3%) |
Fluoxetine | 5 (28) | 6 (21) | 6 (13) | 8 (17) | 12 (16) | 13 (13) | 11 (12) | 13 (13) | 11 (11) | 23 (17) | 15 (12) | 18 (13) | 11 (9) | 12 (9) | 164 (13%) |
Fluvoxamine | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1) | 1 (0%) |
Paroxetine | 1 (6) | 2 (7) | 5 (11) | 8 (17) | 9 (12) | 9 (9) | 6 (6) | 0 (0) | 2 (2) | 4 (3) | 2 (2) | 2 (1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 50 (4%) |
Sertraline | 6 (33) | 16 (57) | 18 (40) | 20 (42) | 24 (33) | 33 (33) | 34 (37) | 35 (34) | 38 (39) | 39 (28) | 55 (43) | 59 (42) | 42 (36) | 58 (44) | 477 (38%) |
Duloxetine | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | 2 (2) | 2 (1) | 2 (2) | 5 (4) | 3 (3) | 2 (2) | 17 (1%) |
Venlafaxine | 0 (0) | 1 (4) | 3 (7) | 2 (4) | 3 (4) | 4 (4) | 3 (3) | 6 (6) | 5 (5) | 7 (5) | 8 (6) | 3 (2) | 8 (7) | 6 (5) | 59 (5%) |
Poor neonatal adaptation | 0 (0) | 1 (4) | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | 2 (3) | 2 (2) | 1 (1) | 5 (5) | 5 (5) | 5 (4) | 4 (3) | 7 (5) | 6 (5) | 5 (4) | 44 (3%) |
Exposure groups | Fraction with poor neonatal adaptation (%) | Unadjusted analysis | PS-weighted analysis | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
RR for poor neonatal adaptation (95% CI) | P value | RR for poor neonatal adaptation (95% CI) | P value | ||
Serotonergic antidepressant monotherapy vs bupropion monotherapy | |||||
SSRI or SNRI | 41/1101 (3.7%) | 4.43 (0.62-31.93) | .14 | 4.20 (0.58-30.56) | .16 |
SSRI | 35/1027 (3.4%) | 4.06 (0.56-29.33) | .17 | 3.94 (0.54-28.88) | .18 |
SNRI | 6/74 (8.1%) | 9.65 (1.19-78.56) | .034 | 9.43 (0.93-95.90) | .058 |
Bupropion | 1/119 (0.8%) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | ||
Individual SSRI monotherapy vs bupropion monotherapy | |||||
Sertraline | 15/471 (3.2%) | 3.79 (0.51-28.40) | .19 | 2.98 (0.39-22.95) | .29 |
Citalopram or escitalopram | 11/341 (3.2%) | 3.84 (0.50-29.42) | .20 | 4.83 (0.61-37.88) | .13 |
Fluoxetine | 5/164 (3.0%) | 3.63 (0.43-30.65) | .24 | 5.32 (0.58-49.19) | .14 |
Paroxetine | 4/50 (8.0%) | 9.52 (1.09-83.07) | .041 | 9.03 (0.79-103.24) | .077 |
Bupropion | 1/119 (0.8%) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) |
Exposure groups | Fraction with poor neonatal adaptation (%) | Unadjusted analysis | PS-weighted analysis | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
RR for poor neonatal adaptation (95% CI) | P value | RR for poor neonatal adaptation (95% CI) | P value | ||
SSRI monotherapy | |||||
High dose | 20/347 (5.8%) | 2.61 (1.35-5.04) | .004 | 2.29 (1.17-4.48) | .015 |
Standard dose | 15/680 (2.2%) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | ||
Sertraline monotherapy | |||||
High dose | 10/167 (6.0%) | 3.64 (1.27-10.47) | .017 | 3.31 (1.05-10.39) | .041 |
Standard dose | 5/304 (1.6%) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | ||
Citalopram or escitalopram monotherapy | |||||
High dose | 6/118 (5.1%) | 2.27 (0.71-7.28) | .17 | 2.06 (0.59-7.19) | .26 |
Standard dose | 5/223 (2.2%) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | ||
Fluoxetine monotherapy | |||||
High dose | 2/51 (3.9%) | 1.48 (0.25-8.57) | .66 | 1.12 (0.16-7.98) | .91 |
Standard dose | 3/113 (2.7%) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | ||
Paroxetine monotherapy | |||||
High dose | 2/11 (18.2%) | 3.55 (0.56-22.37) | .18 | 113.14 (2.86-4478.31) | .012 |
Standard dose | 2/39 (5.1%) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | ||
SNRI monotherapy c Relative risks were not estimated for the analysis evaluating the association of high-dose SNRI exposure with the risk of poor neonatal adaptation because of no infants developing poor neonatal adaptation in the group exposed to high-dose SNRI; the P value results from the Fisher exact test. The unadjusted difference (high- vs standard-dose SNRI) in the proportion of patients who developed poor neonatal adaptation was −9.7% (95% CI, −19.5% to 15.1%). The CI for the difference in independent proportions was estimated using the Wilson score method. | |||||
High dose | 0/12 (0.0%) | .58 | |||
Standard dose | 6/62 (9.7%) |
Discussion
- Westin A.A.
- Brekke M.
- Molden E.
- Skogvoll E.
- Spigset O.
Conclusion
Potential Competing Interests
Acknowledgments
Supplemental Online Material
- Supplemental Materials
References
- Pharmacologic factors associated with transient neonatal symptoms following prenatal psychotropic medication exposure.J Clin Psychiatry. 2004; 65: 230-237
- Neonatal abstinence syndrome after in utero exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in term infants.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006; 160: 173-176
- Mother-infant antidepressant concentrations, maternal depression, and perinatal events.J Clin Psychiatry. 2011; 72: 994-1001
- The effect of prenatal antidepressant exposure on neonatal adaptation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Clin Psychiatry. 2013; 74: e309-e320
- Neonatal symptoms following maternal paroxetine treatment serotonin toxicity or paroxetine discontinuation syndrome?.J Psychopharmacol. 2005; 19: 554-557
- Effects of exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors during pregnancy on serotonergic symptoms in newborns and cord blood monoamine and prolactin concentrations.Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003; 60: 720-726
- Diagnosis and management of poor neonatal adaptation syndrome in newborns exposed in utero to selective serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009; 31: 348-350
- Neonatal morbidity after maternal use of antidepressant drugs during pregnancy.Pediatrics. 2016; 138e20160181https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-0181
- Child developmental outcomes in preschool children following antidepressant exposure in pregnancy.Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015; 49: 642-650
- Neonatal adaptation following intrauterine antidepressant exposure: assessment, drug assay levels, and infant development outcomes.Pediatr Res. 2017; 82: 806-813
- Antidepressant exposure in pregnancy and child sensorimotor and visuospatial development.J Psychiatr Res. 2021; 143: 485-491https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.11.035
- Long-term outcome following selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor induced neonatal abstinence syndrome.J Perinatol. 2011; 31: 615-620
- The roles of maternal depression, serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment, and concomitant benzodiazepine use on infant neurobehavioral functioning over the first postnatal month.Am J Psychiatry. 2016; 173: 147-157
- Impact of maternal depression on pregnancies and on early attachment.Infant Ment Health J. 2014; 35: 354-365
- A literature update on maternal-fetal attachment.J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008; 37: 315-328
- Antidepressant prescription claims among reproductive-aged women with private employer-sponsored insurance—Unites States 2008-2013.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016; 65: 41-46
- Use of antidepressant medications during pregnancy: a multisite study.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 198: 194.e1https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.036
- Increase in use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in pregnancy during the last decade, a population-based cohort study from the Netherlands.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008; 65: 600-606
- Prevalence of antidepressant use during pregnancy in Denmark, a nation-wide cohort study.PLoS One. 2013; 8e63034https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063034
- Venlafaxine prescription claims among ensured woman of reproductive age and pregnant women, 2011-2016.Birth Defects Res. 2021; 113: 1052-1056
- Neonatal signs after late in utero exposure to serotonin reuptake inhibitors.JAMA. 2005; 293: 2372-2383
- Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine in pregnancy: changes in drug disposition.PLoS One. 2017; 12e0181082https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181082
- Safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in pregnancy.CNS Drugs. 2009; 23: 493-509
Hudak ML, Tan RC, Committee on Drugs, et al. Neonatal drug withdrawal. Pediatrics. 2012;129(2):e540-e560.
- Neonatal complications after maternal concomitant use of SSRI and other central nervous system active drugs during the second or third trimester of pregnancy.J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012; 32: 608-614
- Relation between prenatal maternal mood and anxiety and neonatal health.Can J Psychiatry. 2004; 49: 684-689
- Is poor neonatal adaptation after exposure to antidepressant medication related to fetal cortisol levels? An explorative study.Early Hum Dev. 2016; 98: 37-43
- Serotonin and poor neonatal adaptation after antidepressant exposure in utero.Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2017; 29: 43-53
- Depression during pregnancy.Best Pract Res Clin Obstetr Gynaecol. 2015; 29: 754-764
- To combine or not to combine? A literature review of antidepressant combination therapy.J Affect Disord. 2005; 89: 1-11
- History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project: half a century of medical records linkage in a United States population.Mayo Clin Proc. 2012; 87: 1202-1213
- Data resource profile: the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) medical records-linkage system.Int J Epidemiol. 2012; 41: 1614-1624
- Data resource profile: expansion of the Rochester Epidemiology Project medical records-linkage system (E-REP).Int J Epidemiol. 2018; 47: 368https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyx268
- Generalizability of epidemiological findings and public health decisions: an illustration from the Rochester Epidemiology Project.Mayo Clin Proc. 2012; 87: 151-160
- Using RxNorm and NDF-RT to classify medication data extracted from electronic health records: experiences from the Rochester Epidemiology Project.AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011; 2011: 1089-1098
- Age and sex patterns of drug prescribing in a defined American population.Mayo Clin Proc. 2013; 88: 697-707
- An electronic health record driven algorithm to identify incident antidepressant medication users.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014; 21: 785-791
- Defined daily dose: definition and general considerations. World Health Organization.https://www.whocc.no/ddd/definition_and_general_considera/Date accessed: April 24, 2022
- Associations between statin use and suicidality, depression, anxiety, and seizures: a Swedish total-population cohort study.Lancet Psychiatry. 2020; 7: 982-990
- A scoring system for evaluation and treatment of the neonatal abstinence syndrome: a new clinical and research tool.in: Moriselli P.L. Garattini S. Sereni F. Basic and Therapeutic Aspects of Perinatal Pharmacology. Raven Press, New York1975: 139-155
- The opioid exposed newborn: assessment and pharmacologic management.J Opioid Manag. 2009; 5: 47
- Neonatal utcome and adaptation after in utero exposure to antidepressants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2022; 145: 6-28
- A modified Poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.Am J Epidemiol. 2004; 159: 702-706
- A weighting analogue to pair matching in propensity score analysis.Int J Biostat. 2013; 9: 215-234
- Addressing extreme propensity score via the overlap weights.Am J Epidemiol. 2019; 188: 250-257
- Bupropion: a review of its mechanism of antidepressant activity.J Clin Psychiatry. 1995; 56: 395-401
- Pharmacology of antidepressants.Mayo Clin Proc. 2001; 76: 511-527
- Depression drug treatment outcomes in pregnancy and the postpartum period: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 124: 526-534
- Neonatal adaptation in infants prenatally exposed to antidepressants-clinical monitoring using neonatal abstinence score.PLoS One. 2014; 9: e111327
- Prenatal exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and infant outcomes.Ther Drug Monit. 2012; 34: 607-614
- Neonatal discontinuation syndrome in serotonergic antidepressant-exposed neonates.J Clin Psychiatry. 2017; 78: 605-611
- Dose-response relationship of recent antidepressants in the short-term treatment of depression.Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2005; 7: 249-262
- A mega-analysis of fixed-dose trials reveals dose-dependency and a rapid onset of action for the antidepressant effect of three selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.Transl Psychiatry. 2016; 6: e834
- Changes in antidepressant metabolism and dosing across pregnancy and early postpartum.J Clin Psychiatry. 2008; 69: 652-658
- Pregnancy-induced changes in pharmacokinetics.Clin Pharmacokinet. 2005; 44: 989-1008
- Complex challenges in treating depression during pregnancy.Am J Psychiatry. 2013; 170: 12-20
- Management of psychotropic drugs during pregnancy.BMJ. 2016; 532: h5918https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5918
- Clinical practice: depression during pregnancy.N Engl J Med. 2011; 365: 1605-1611
- Antidepressant exposure during pregnancy and congenital malformations: is there an association? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the best evidence.J Clin Psychiatry. 2013; 74: 903
- Guidelines on treatment of perinatal depression with antidepressants: an international review.Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2018; 52: 320-327
- Pharmacotherapy for perinatal depression.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 61: 544-561
- Success of smoking cessation interventions during pregnancy.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 215: 611.e1
- Effectiveness of bupropion for smoking cessation during pregnancy.J Addict Dis. 2005; 24: 19-23
- Pregnancy outcome of women exposed to bupropion during pregnancy: a prospective comparative study.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 192: 932-936
- Antidepressant prescription claims among reproductive-aged women with private employer-sponsored insurance—United States 2008–2013.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016; 65: 41-46
- Inhibition of CYP2D6 activity by bupropion.J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005; 25: 226-229
- Combining bupropion SR with venlafaxine, paroxetine, or fluoxetine: a preliminary report on pharmacokinetic, therapeutic, and sexual dysfunction effects.J Clin Psychiatry. 2002; 63: 181-186
- Psychopharmacology of anxiety disorders.Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2002; 4: 271-285
- Maternal anxiety during pregnancy and the association with adverse perinatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.J Clin Psychiatry. 2018; 79: 813
- Risk factors for poor neonatal adaptation after exposure to antidepressants in utero.Acta Paediatrica. 2015; 104: 384-391
- Risk of poor neonatal adaptation syndrome among infants exposed to second-generation atypical antipsychotics compared to antidepressants: results from the National Pregnancy Registry for Psychiatric Medications.J Clin Psychiatry. 2023; 8444950
Article info
Publication history
Footnotes
Grant Support: Funding for this project was provided by Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science and Mayo Clinic Children’s Research Center. Neither Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science nor Mayo Clinic Children’s Research Center contributed to the study design; collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; writing of the report; or the decision to submit the report for publication. W.V.B.’s research has been supported by National Institute of Mental Health, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, National Science Foundation, the Myocarditis Foundation, and the Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. He has contributed chapters to UpToDate regarding the pharmacological treatment of adults with bipolar disorders. The remaining authors report no potential conflicts of interest.
Identification
Copyright
User license
Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
Permitted
For non-commercial purposes:
- Read, print & download
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article (private use only, not for distribution)
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
Not Permitted
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
- Distribute translations or adaptations of the article
Elsevier's open access license policy